The "34,540 list" specifically refers to a "one-time" recruitment of trained teachers ordered by the Supreme Court of India to fill long-vacant primary school positions. Unlike the current BPSC TRE cycles, this list was based on a system for candidates who had completed their teacher training years ago.
The process has been highly scrutinized and was subject to multiple, long-standing legal challenges, often overseen by the . The final merit list is crucial for candidates who participated in the counselling processes held across various Bihar districts, including Gaya and Siwan . Key Details of the 34540 Teacher List Target: 34,540 Primary Teachers. Recruitment Type: Regular Trained Teacher Appointment.
List of applicants for counselling of regular teacher ... - Siwan 34540 teacher list in bihar pdf 29
This guide is designed to clarify what this specific document is, why the number "34540" is significant, how to navigate the PDF, and the legal/bureaucratic context surrounding it.
One of the most common official lists being published today is for granting benefits under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) . This scheme provides financial upgradation to teachers who have completed certain years of service without regular promotion. The provisional list from Buxar is a key example of this. The "34,540 list" specifically refers to a "one-time"
The matter escalated via contempt petitions to the Supreme Court of India ( Nand Kishor Ojha vs. State of Bihar ). Recognizing an explicit undertaking given by the state in 2006, a Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Altamas Kabir and H.L. Dattu ordered Bihar to recruit exactly as a special, one-time measure. This bypassed several restrictive conditions introduced under new localized recruitment rules. The 2010 Advertisement and 2012 Appointments
and district-level notices, the lists typically include the following data points for each teacher: Personal Identification: Applicant Name Father's Name Date of Birth Seniority Details: The lists are often categorized as Integrated Session-wise Seniority Lists The final merit list is crucial for candidates
The Patna High Court intervened, insisting that only trained teachers should be appointed to improve educational quality.
While the original recruitment was completed years ago, administrative updates and legal cases related to these specific teachers continue to surface:
: Because the lists factored in historical training sessions, many selected candidates were already in their late 50s when appointed in 2012. This led to situations where teachers retired mere months after their initial appointment.